Once the terminology has been rendered , the dual process of de-stigmatization and de-sensitization begins in earnest. Typically an “expert” will propose the idea that pedophiles (or “MAPs”) are simply born that way, it’s not their fault. For this we can look at a Sept. 2020 issue of Psychology Today and discover that (in the article “Performative Rage Over Pedophilia Doesn't Protect Kids”), “Pedophiles appear to be born, not made, and have distinct neurological differences which correlate with these disturbed sexual desires.” Similarly, word-play conveniently confuses the narrative, with claims such as”Less than half (around 40%) of sexual assaults against children are committed by pedophiles.” In other words, 60% of adults who have sex with children are not pedophiles, but regular folk such as “relatives, siblings, parents, teachers, pastors, ministers, or neighbors.” See how that works? How about “60% of people who steal cars are not car thieves.” Note that Christian clergy are mentioned twice.

Realizing the ultimate goal is to normalize behavior previously considered aberrant, if not frankly evil, lots of patience and subtlety are required for de-stigmatization and de-sensitization. Part of this is to test the waters, to see how much progress has been made. A recent example of this is found in Minnesota, where there are legal protected classes based on “gender identity” and “sexual orientation.” Regarding the latter, an exception to the sexual orientation protected class specified a “...physical or sexual attachment to children by an adult.” In other words, a pedophile was not part of a “protected class.” A proposal was introduced to remove this exception- i.e. not placing them in the protected class but not specifically excluding them either. This change was sought by a “transgender” Democrat (of course) state representative, under the guise of the “Take Pride Act.” At this time, the proposed amendment was withdrawn due to enough outcry, but that’s okay because it was only a test to see where the pro-pedophile sentiment is.

The wheels keep grinding, however, and nothing bolsters the legitimization of a perversion such as pedophilia like the prestige of revered global body. Recently, two U.N. agencies (UNAIDS and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), in conjunction with the International Committee of Jurists, published a report, that included, “With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage. Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual, in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them.

Wow, sophisticated language coming from highly educated people. These various bodies are controlled by globalist elites or, in many cases, thugs. Nevertheless, they may seem to have legitimate credentials, especially to gullible people, and use their status to make evil sound palatable. Hence, aristocrat elitist or despotic hoodlum, we can expect the times to be a’changing in regards to adults having sex with children. The question one might reasonably ask, is “Why?”

First, perhaps it’s simply a continuation of the sexual revolution of the 1960’s, where hedonism (“if it feels good, do it!”) masqueraded as a noble liberation movement, where a frat boy from the upper middle-class suburbs could pick up a girl and say, “Let’s get it on and stick it to the Man” while actually sticking it elsewhere.

Second, in regards to the UN and other international bodies, they are largely controlled by either petty despots whose cravings for greed and power obviate decency and morality, or urbane globalists who similarly (despite the pretense of sophistication) lust for wealth, power, and control. I posit that in these (what are) essentially sociopathic people, satisfaction of all desires, including carnal ones involving kids or otherwise, are just assumed and should simply be accepted.

Third, sexualizing children is not new, especially in the motion picture and fashion world. What is new is sexualizing prepubescent children, which can be seen in some of the photos on these pages. A caring and responsible person cannot, by definition, look at an ad featuring a 10-year-old dressed up and made-up to look like some 20-something girl out clubbing, looking for a hook-up, and say, “Man, she’s hot!” Does this form of exploitation and perversion sell; is there profit to be made?

Forth, there seems to be “intersectionality” between the nascent movement to normalize pedophilia and the transgender movement, currently the most hysterical progressive cause, which achieves both perniciousness and absurdity. While pedophilia involves adults having actual sex with children, transgender doctrine increasingly involves sexualizing them, a precursor to pedophilia. This is seen with one of the most odious sub-divisions of the transgender world: drag queen story time for children, where little kids learn that womanhood is nothing more than dressing flamboyantly and erotically and frenetically seeking attention. More worrisome is exhorting (and coercing) children to imitate them.

Mostly, however, is the desperate need of the transgender industry to recruit as many children as possible, again to exhort and coerce, and obtain the “consent” of these children to have their bodies polluted and mutilated: the industry needs a sustainable source of fodder. If children are deemed competent to consent to their own “transgender” debasement, they certainly can “consent” to having sex with adults.

Fifth, in the global sense, the world seems to be cycling once again toward authoritarian rule, the only difference between 20^th century dictators and 21^st century wannabe dictators being the former were into strongman militarism and latter are into metrosexual hipsterism, exchanging uniforms for casual Friday jeans and loafers. Nevertheless, they all yearn for unchecked power and control over the unwashed and unsophisticated- previously known as regular people- who aren’t elite like them (Justin Trudeau of Canada being an excellent example). There are many impediments to their ascent to power and these require stamping out. Certainly free expression is an obstacle, let alone an armed citizenry, but the greatest threat to their lusting for control is people with moral courage...and the idea of morality itself.

This is old news, of course, eroding morality and filling the vacuum with slogans, grandiose promises, angry righteousness, and moral relativism. And nothing achieves this end more effectively than targeting children, first through indoctrination but eventually leading to the disintegration of the basis of morality- the family. It is no surprise that the evolving global elite are walking in lock-step to support polluting children with chemicals and mutilating them under the guise of “transgenderism,” ultimately devaluing them, stealing from children their very childhoods and making them sexual objects.

The state of Washington recently empowered itself to remove children from parents if the latter were not willing to sacrifice their children to the “gender affirmation” machine. What an awesome power, breaking apart families to satisfy the greed of the progressive political class. It’s not all that different from ripping children from parents and parents from children in the 19^th century to satisfy the greed of the slave-holding class. Inevitably to follow: you must accept your prepubescent child having sex with adults or risk losing them to the State.

I have had the opportunity as a medical practitioner (PA) to clinically interact with pedophiles, first at a prison and later at a facility for people of borderline intellect. The stereotypical pedophile- the pervert- certainly does exist and they are truly repulsive. On the other hand, I’ve had pedophile patients who knew nothing else during their entire lives, including one young man who was first raped at six-months old and subsequently passed around between his father and his uncles. For him, sex with children was normalized, which is paradoxically the same goal of the evolving “children have the right to have control over their own bodies” globalist movement. It’s okay to not view all pedophiles with contempt, and even have compassion for them in some cases. It is most definitely okay to hold those with cultural and political power who are willing to exploit and dehumanize children to satisfy their own lusts in utter contempt.

Addendum- From the World Health Organization, the quintessential globalist organization and de-facto arm of communist China: Children under four should 'ask questions about sexuality' and 'explore gender identities,' and be provided information about 'enjoyment and pleasure when touching one's own body, early childhood masturbation.' They should also learn skills to 'gain an awareness of gender identity,’ and children aged between four and six years should 'talk about sexual matters' and 'consolidate their gender identity.' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12082967/Fury-WHOs-sex-education-early-childhood-masturbation-FOURS.html